What’s with contractions? Ideally, they’re handy time savers
that make speaking and writing a bit more efficient. But some of them really don’t
(well, there I go) save you any time.
Take “didn’t”, for instance. I did the same number of keystrokes as typing
out the full “did not” and both versions take two syllables to say. So, I think we can render “didn’t” useless.
Same with “isn’t”, “couldn’t” and “wouldn’t”. Get rid of ‘em. “We’ve” is nice, but we usually say “got”
after it, so get rid of that one. I do like
“can’t”, “aren’t”, “won’t”. “Ain’t” is
fine as far as I’m concerned. It’s more efficient than “am not” or “is not”,
but the grammar folks tell us we can’t (there I go again) use it and I respect
that. But that makes absolutely no sense because “ain’t” replaces two different
phrases (“am not” and “is not”) making it that much more cool of a contraction. Of course contractions are never used by
someone who is mad at you. “I did not!” People
go all King James on you when they’re (there’s one!) mad.
“Don’t” is great because the phrase “Do not” is too often confused with
the word “doughnut”. You’ll notice that
there are a lot of Dunkin’ Doughnut shops at downtown corners near the “Walk/Doughnut
Walk” lights. Check this next time you're downtown. They sneak that
advertising in wherever they can.
No comments:
Post a Comment